Michigan Legislature’s GOP leaders want to defend abortion ban in court

Republican leadership says it’s acting on behalf of the Legislature as an institution because Nessel, a Democrat, won’t defend the dormant state law.

Michigan House of Representatives chamber in Lansing.

Michigan House of Representatives chamber in Lansing.

The Michigan Legislature’s Republican leaders say they want to step in to defend the state’s dormant abortion ban if Attorney General Dana Nessel won’t.

The GOP leadership says it’s acting on behalf of the Legislature as an institution because Nessel, a Democrat, refuses to defend the dormant state law. The brief says the Legislature should decide what happens with abortion rights in Michigan if Roe v. Wade is overturned.

“The public is best served by letting the democratic process play out, and it is harmed when the judiciary seizes the issue from the people constitutionally empowered – and, practically, best poised – to resolve it,” the brief says.

Attorney General Dana Nessel has said her office will not oppose allowing the Legislature to join the lawsuit.

The brief asks the Court of Claims to allow the Legislature to join the case and to reverse an earlier decision to bar enforcement of the ban if Roe is overturned. Michigan’s statutory ban is very strict with no exceptions for cases of rape or incest or to protect the health of a pregnant woman. It only allows abortions that are necessary to “preserve the life” of the woman.

Nessel has said her office will not oppose allowing the Legislature to join the lawsuit. In part, that’s because without a defendant there would be no controversy for a court to hear. But she did release a statement blasting the Republican position.

“I have made very clear that I will not put the lives of Michigan women in jeopardy by using the resources of my office to defend Michigan’s 1931 statute criminalizing abortion,” she said.

The Court of Claims is not the only legal track being used by supporters of abortion rights.

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has asked the Michigan Supreme Court to directly take up the question of whether the state constitution’s privacy protections also cover abortion rights. That case is before the Michigan Court of Appeals.

Trusted, accurate, up-to-date.

WDET strives to make our journalism accessible to everyone. As a public media institution, we maintain our journalistic integrity through independent support from readers like you. If you value WDET as your source of news, music and conversation, please make a gift today.

Donate today »

Author